• Home
  • Sundays
  • Find us
  • Contact us
  • Resources
  • About
  • Sermons
  • Minister’s Blog
  • Guided Reading Course


  • Bible

    Email This Post


    « Previous Entries Next Entries »

    And the world is a big place - 17 November 2011

    Some thoughts found in and provoked by Douglas Jones on the Gospel of Luke:

    A chiasm in Luke 4:31-37 - 9 November 2011

    Jesus takes his message to the outlying regions
    31 And he went down to Capernaum, a city of Galilee. And he was teaching them on the Sabbath,

    Teaching with authority
    32 and they were astonished at his teaching, for his word possessed authority.

    The man is possessed by the demon
    33 And in the synagogue there was a man who had the spirit of an unclean demon,

    The demon cried out
    and he cried out with a loud voice,  34 “Ha! What have you to do with us, Jesus of Nazareth? Have you come to destroy us?

    I know who you are – the Holy One of God.”

    The demon is silenced
    35 But Jesus rebuked him, saying, “Be silent and come out of him!”

    The man is freed from the demon
    And when the demon had thrown him down in their midst, he came out of him, having done him no harm.

    Teaching with authority
    36 And they were all amazed and said to one another, “What is this word? For with authority and power he commands the unclean spirits, and they come out!”

    Reports about Jesus are taken to the outlying regions
    37 And reports about him went out into every place in the surrounding region.

    His service is perfect freedom - 4 November 2011

    The word “servant” (‘ebed) appears frequently in 2 Samuel 9, and following the use of this term highlights some intriguing threads in the narrative.

    Paul never said that - 2 November 2011

    Most scholars today doubt that the apostle Paul wrote the letter to the Hebrews. There are, however, a few – past and present – who believe he did. John Owen, for one.

    Personally, I think it’s unlikely, for several reasons. Here’s the argument that intrigues me the most (I think it was David Field who first mentioned it to me):

    Is it really possible that Paul would have spoken of the message that “was attested to us by those who heard” (Heb 2:3), having placed such great emphasis in Gal 1:16-17 the fact that he did not consult with the other apostles before (or even immediately after) his personal encounter with the risen Christ? Hebrews 2:3 could surely only have been written by someone who heard the Gospel second-hand, not from Jesus personally.

    The fast track to unpopularity - 2 November 2011

    “People love their hometown heroes, but not their local prophets. Prophets have a way of confronting sin and unbelief, as Jesus did, and this is hardly the way to become popular.” (Ryken, Luke, p. 183)

    Arrows in the hand - 28 October 2011

    2 Samuel 3 begins with the note that “there was a long war between the house of Saul and the house of David. And David grew stronger and stronger, while the house of Saul became weaker and weaker” (v. 1). Then, as if to explain David’s strength over Saul, there follows a list of David’s children, before the war-theme returns explicitly in v. 6.

    So, here’s a question: why the digression? What is the connection between a list of children and a record of warfare? The answer is found in Psalm 127:4-5:

    Like arrows in the hand of a warrior
    are the children of one’s youth.
    Blessed is the man who fills his quiver with them!
    He shall not be put to shame
    when he speaks with his enemies in the gate.

    Not just random shots - 25 October 2011

    Some thoughts found in, and provoked by, Douglas Jones on Luke 4:1-13, the temptations of Jesus:

    No ordinary temptations - 25 October 2011

    The temptations of Jesus (Lk 4) are a recapitulation of both Israel’s temptation in the wilderness and Adam’s temptation in the garden. This serves as a reminder that these two earlier events are connected, and that therefore in the covenant-historical framework of Scripture the Adamic background must be kept in view when considering the history of Israel.

    Sent by the Spirit - 20 October 2011

    Some thoughts from Robert Tannehill, The Narrative Unity of Luke-Acts (vol 1), on Jesus’ baptism in Luke 3:21-22.

    Bit by bit - 19 October 2011

    Matthew 13:24-43 teaches that the kingdom of heaven will grow gradually, reaching a great extent until it finally influences the whole world, before the harvest is gathered in and the remaining weeds are uprooted.

    Just Luke - 17 October 2011

    A few thoughts found in, and prompted by, from Arthur Just’s commentary on Luke (vol 1), on Jesus’ baptism, Luke 3:21-22:

    Not very missional - 13 October 2011

    Some thoughts found in, or provoked by, Douglas Jones on Luke 3:1-20

    A chaiasm in Luke 3:1-20 - 11 October 2011

    Oppression from the powers
    1 In the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar, Pontius Pilate being governor of Judea, and Herod being tetrarch of Galilee, and his brother Philip tetrarch of the region of Ituraea and Trachonitis, and Lysanias tetrarch of Abilene, 2 during the high priesthood of Annas and Caiaphas, the word of God came to John the son of Zechariah in the wilderness.

    Baptism and gospel-proclamation
    3 And he went into all the region around the Jordan, proclaiming a baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of sins. 4 As it is written in the book of the words of Isaiah the prophet, “The voice of one crying in the wilderness: ‘Prepare the way of the Lord, make his paths straight. 5 Every valley shall be filled, and every mountain and hill shall be made low, and the crooked shall become straight, and the rough places shall become level ways, 6 and all flesh shall see the salvation of God.’”

    Call to repentance
    7 He said therefore to the crowds that came out to be baptized by him, “You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the wrath to come? 8 Bear fruits in keeping with repentance. And do not begin to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father.’ For I tell you, God is able from these stones to raise up children for Abraham. 9 Even now the axe is laid to the root of the trees. Every tree therefore that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.”

    Call to repentance
    10 And the crowds asked him, “What then shall we do?” 11 And he answered them, “Whoever has two tunics is to share with him who has none, and whoever has food is to do likewise.” 12 Tax collectors also came to be baptized and said to him, “Teacher, what shall we do?” 13 And he said to them, “Collect no more than you are authorized to do.” 14 Soldiers also asked him, “And we, what shall we do?” And he said to them, “Do not extort money from anyone by threats or by false accusation, and be content with your wages.”

    Baptism and gospel-proclamation
    15 As the people were in expectation, and all were questioning in their hearts concerning John, whether he might be the Christ, 16 John answered them all, saying, “I baptize you with water, but he who is mightier than I is coming, the strap of whose sandals I am not worthy to untie. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and with fire. 17 His winnowing fork is in his hand, to clear his threshing floor and to gather the wheat into his barn, but the chaff he will burn with unquenchable fire.” 18 So with many other exhortations he preached good news to the people.

    Oppression from the powers
    19 But Herod the tetrarch, who had been reproved by him for Herodias, his brother’s wife, and for all the evil things that Herod had done, 20 added this to them all, that he locked up John in prison.

    A Chiasm in Luke 2:40-52 - 11 October 2011

    40 And the child grew and became strong, filled with wisdom. And the favour of God was upon him.

    41 Now his parents went to Jerusalem every year at the Feast of the Passover. 42 And when he was twelve years old, they went up according to custom.

    43 And when the feast was ended, as they were returning, the boy Jesus stayed behind in Jerusalem. His parents did not know it,

    44 but supposing him to be in the group they went a day’s journey, but then they began to search for him among their relatives and acquaintances, 45 and when they did not find him, they returned to Jerusalem, searching for him.

    46 After three days they found him in the temple, sitting among the teachers, listening to them and asking them questions. 47 And all who heard him were amazed at his understanding and his answers.

    48 And when his parents saw him, they were astonished. And his mother said to him, “Son, why have you treated us so? Behold, your father and I have been searching for you in great distress.”

    49 And he said to them, “Why were you looking for me? Did you not know that I must be in my Father’s house?” 50 And they did not understand the saying that he spoke to them.

    51 And he went down with them and came to Nazareth and was submissive to them. And his mother treasured up all these things in her heart.

    52 And Jesus increased in wisdom and in stature and in favour with God and man.

    What did Simeon see? - 28 September 2011

    “It had been revealed to him by the Holy Spirit that he would not SEE death before he had SEEN the Lord’s Christ.” (Luke 2:26)

    He saw the source of life before he saw death.

    Priest-King-Prophet revisited - 27 September 2011

    A while ago I tentatively floated this priest-king-prophet structure for 2 Chronicles 13-20:

    Abijah (2 Ch 13) – complacency concerning the Priesthood

    Asa (2 Ch 14-16) – loyalty to the wrong King

    Jehoshaphat (2 Ch 17-20) – disrespect for the LORD’s Prophet

    It turns out the 2 Ch 23 matches this rather nicely, lending further support to the prophet-priest-king outline. Here’s how it works.

    After three disastrous monarchs (Jehoram, Azariah and Athaliah), Joash is rescued from Ahaziah’s murderous rampage. There are obvious echoes here of Abimelech (Judges 9) in Athaliah’s killing spree. Joash is depicted as a new Moses – being saved as a child from death at the hands of an idolatrous Monarch by (guess who…?) his sister. So you’ve got high hopes for Joash as the next chapter begins.

    Chapter 23 then systematically unravels the priest-king-prophet mess from the previous chapters.

    The faithful Priest Jehoiada re-constitutes the Levitical service in the house of God (23:1-7).

    The Levites lead the people in crowning the right King and executing the upstart Athaliah (23:8-15).

    Jehoida takes the role of faithful Prophet, speaking to the people in order to make a covenant with them to bind them to faithfulness in the future (23:16-21)

    Priest – king – prophet - 23 September 2011

    Abijah (2 Ch 13) – complacency concerning the Priesthood

    Asa (2 Ch 14-16) – loyalty to the wrong King

    Jehoshaphat (2 Ch 17-20) – disrespect for the LORD’s Prophet

    It’s at least possible, isn’t it? And it wouldn’t be the first time. Or the last.

    Four horns - 30 August 2011

    Given that Zechariah mentions only one “horn of salvation” in Luke 1:69, perhaps the title of this sermon needs a little explanation.

    The horns of an animal are the dangerous bits. The business end of the beast, so to speak. They thus represent the strength of an animal.

    Besides this, however, horns had other uses in ancient Israel. They were hollowed out and used as containters for oil, and thus became associated with the anointing of Priests, Prophets and Kings. They were also used as trumpets, and thus came to be connected with the praises of the people of God or the call to battle of the LORD’s army.

    Finally, horns were used as a blueprint in the tabernnacle and temple architecture. In particular, the altar had horn-shaped projections (called “horns”) on its corners, where sacrificial blood was sprinkled during sacrificial rituals.

    So, putting it all together, we have something like this:

    Horns of an animal – the strength of the LORD
    Horns of the altar – the sacrificial blood of the Son
    A horn full of oil – the anointing of the Spirit
    A horn as a trumpet – the praises of God’s people

    If that sounds vaguely trinitarian (Father-Son-Spirit => people), that’s because it is.

    Super eight - 11 August 2011

    If you’re reading the Bible carefully, you already know there’s something peculiarly special about the number eight. Eight people in the ark; you give your ox to the LORD on the eighth day; David was Jesse’s eighth son; Jesus was raised on the eighth day; and so on.

    As Henri Blocher once said, the number eight is a kind of numerical symbol for the new creation. No surprise, really, since four symbolises the whole world (four corners, right?) and twice four is eight, and therefore a second world.

    All OK so far? Good.

    So then you’re reading through 1 Chronicles 26, diligently poring over the divisions of labour for the gatekeepers, the sons of Meshelemiah and Obed-Edom. (As my kids like to sing, “1 Chronicles, 1 Chronicles, the book with lots of funny names.”)

    And lo and behold, as the Chronicler carefully enumerates O-E’s sons, he gets to “Peullethai, the eighth, for God blessed him” (v. 5).

    More on Levi’s three sons - 29 July 2011

    In a previous post I said a few things about the surprising order and proportions of the genealogies of Levi’s descendants Gershon, Kohath and Merari in 1 Chronicles 6. A quick glance through the later part of that chapter reveals similar emphases in the allotment of land. Lots of space is devoted to the allotment of land for the sons of Kohath, “for theirs was the first lot” (v. 54). The Gershonites get slightly less space (vv. 71ff). Finally, Merari is squeezed into the middle (v. 63ff.). And though I’ve not looked hard at the geography, my impression is that Merari’s crowd get quite a lot less space to live in too: only twelve cities (v. 63) compared with considerably more for Gershon and Kohath.

    It’s possible that these differences also reflect the number of their descendants. If Kohath and Gershon had more kids, obviously their list would take more space, and they would also probably end up needing more land. But the fact that this should itself be correlated with their tabernacle privileges (see previous post) is itself interesting, suggesting that the fulfillment of the Abrahamic blessing of descendants in the land (cf. Gen 12) goes hand-in-hand with other privileges in the sanctuary.

    « Previous Entries Next Entries »